The Kremlin maintained silence on Monday regarding the Islamic State group's assertion of responsibility for the deadliest attack in Russia in two decades. The incident, which occurred at the Moscow concert hall where camouflaged gunmen initiated gunfire, resulting in a blaze and claiming the lives of at least 137 individuals, has led to the detention of eleven suspects.

Despite the Islamic State's repeated claims and the circulation of graphic videos depicting the assailants within the venue, Russian authorities have refrained from commenting on IS's alleged involvement. Russian President Vladimir Putin, in his sole public statement on the tragedy, hinted at a potential Ukraine connection. However, no senior Russian official has addressed the IS claims directly.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, in response to queries about Russia's silence on IS's purported role, cited the ongoing investigation and the absence of a definitive version of events. "The investigation is still ongoing. No coherent version has yet been voiced," Peskov stated, emphasizing that preliminary data remains the focus, with no conclusive version being put forward.

As rescuers continue their search for bodies amidst the debris of the burnt-out concert hall, the death toll is anticipated to climb higher. Currently, 97 individuals remain hospitalized, underscoring the gravity of the attack and the challenges faced in its aftermath.

The reluctance of Russian officials to comment directly on IS's claims underscores the complexity of the situation and the cautious approach taken in divulging information amidst ongoing investigations. The possibility of external involvement, whether linked to IS or other entities, adds layers of intricacy to understanding the motives and circumstances surrounding the tragic event.

The silence from the Kremlin reflects a measured response as authorities navigate through the complexities of the incident, ensuring that all avenues are thoroughly explored before definitive conclusions are drawn. As the investigation progresses and more details emerge, clarity may be gained regarding the perpetrators and their affiliations, shedding light on the broader implications of the attack on Russia's security landscape.

The Kremlin maintained silence on Monday regarding the Islamic State group's assertion of responsibility for the deadliest attack in Russia in two decades. The incident, which occurred at the Moscow concert hall where camouflaged gunmen initiated gunfire, resulting in a blaze and claiming the lives of at least 137 individuals, has led to the detention of eleven suspects.

Despite the Islamic State's repeated claims and the circulation of graphic videos depicting the assailants within the venue, Russian authorities have refrained from commenting on IS's alleged involvement. Russian President Vladimir Putin, in his sole public statement on the tragedy, hinted at a potential Ukraine connection. However, no senior Russian official has addressed the IS claims directly.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, in response to queries about Russia's silence on IS's purported role, cited the ongoing investigation and the absence of a definitive version of events. "The investigation is still ongoing. No coherent version has yet been voiced," Peskov stated, emphasizing that preliminary data remains the focus, with no conclusive version being put forward.

As rescuers continue their search for bodies amidst the debris of the burnt-out concert hall, the death toll is anticipated to climb higher. Currently, 97 individuals remain hospitalized, underscoring the gravity of the attack and the challenges faced in its aftermath.

The reluctance of Russian officials to comment directly on IS's claims underscores the complexity of the situation and the cautious approach taken in divulging information amidst ongoing investigations. The possibility of external involvement, whether linked to IS or other entities, adds layers of intricacy to understanding the motives and circumstances surrounding the tragic event.

The silence from the Kremlin reflects a measured response as authorities navigate through the complexities of the incident, ensuring that all avenues are thoroughly explored before definitive conclusions are drawn. As the investigation progresses and more details emerge, clarity may be gained regarding the perpetrators and their affiliations, shedding light on the broader implications of the attack on Russia's security landscape.