The bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Datta emphasized the importance of meaningful criticism while avoiding blind skepticism that could erode trust in systems like the judiciary and legislature. He noted that democracy thrives on maintaining harmony and trust among its pillars. Cultivating a culture of trust and collaboration, he argued, would strengthen the democratic voice.

The bench in its statement underscores the delicate balance required in evaluating institutions like the judiciary and legislature. Blindly doubting these systems can foster widespread skepticism, potentially undermining public faith. Instead, he advocated for constructive criticism rooted in thoughtful analysis and transparency.

The essence of democracy lies in fostering mutual trust and cooperation among its various branches. Each pillar plays a vital role in upholding democratic values and ensuring the system's integrity. By nurturing a culture of trust, stakeholders can work collaboratively to address shortcomings and enhance accountability.

Justice Datta's perspective aligns with the idea that democratic governance thrives on open dialogue and constructive feedback. Meaningful criticism catalyzes positive change, prompting institutions to reflect on their practices and make necessary improvements.

In essence, Justice Khanna's words emphasize the importance of maintaining a critical yet constructive approach to evaluating democratic institutions. By fostering trust, transparency, and collaboration, we can strengthen democracy's foundations and empower citizens to actively engage in shaping their governance.

The bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Datta emphasized the importance of meaningful criticism while avoiding blind skepticism that could erode trust in systems like the judiciary and legislature. He noted that democracy thrives on maintaining harmony and trust among its pillars. Cultivating a culture of trust and collaboration, he argued, would strengthen the democratic voice.

The bench in its statement underscores the delicate balance required in evaluating institutions like the judiciary and legislature. Blindly doubting these systems can foster widespread skepticism, potentially undermining public faith. Instead, he advocated for constructive criticism rooted in thoughtful analysis and transparency.

The essence of democracy lies in fostering mutual trust and cooperation among its various branches. Each pillar plays a vital role in upholding democratic values and ensuring the system's integrity. By nurturing a culture of trust, stakeholders can work collaboratively to address shortcomings and enhance accountability.

Justice Datta's perspective aligns with the idea that democratic governance thrives on open dialogue and constructive feedback. Meaningful criticism catalyzes positive change, prompting institutions to reflect on their practices and make necessary improvements.

In essence, Justice Khanna's words emphasize the importance of maintaining a critical yet constructive approach to evaluating democratic institutions. By fostering trust, transparency, and collaboration, we can strengthen democracy's foundations and empower citizens to actively engage in shaping their governance.