Wednesday, October 20, 2021

News Destination For The Global Indian Community

News Destination For The Global Indian Community

LEGAL
LifeMag
Future Retail seeks early hearing by SC on appeal against HC order

Future Retail seeks early hearing by SC on appeal against HC order


The Supreme Court on Friday said it will give a date on Future Retail Ltd's (FRL) fresh appeal challenging the Delhi High Court order, which asked it to implement its earlier direction restraining the firm from going ahead with its Rs 24,731 crore merger with Reliance Retail.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana told counsel representing the FRL: "Let me look into the file and I will give a date."

Senior advocates Harish Salve and Mukul Rohatgi, representing the FRL, sought early hearing on the appeal from the bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant and A.S. Bopanna. The counsel sought early hearing on appeal, as the high court would go ahead with the enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator's (EA's) award, if stay is not granted in its favour by the apex court.

Salve argued that the high court order will have far-reaching consequences and added that the FRL's appeal be heard on September 9, as the high court is scheduled to hear the matter on September 16.

Referring to another appeal, Rohatgi contended high court had ordered attachment of entire property. He further added contempt proceedings would be initiated if the Future group and others do not get a favourable order from the top court.

On August 17, the high court asked FRL to implement the earlier single-judge bench order restraining it from going ahead with the deal. The high court passed the order as e-commerce giant Amazon sought enforcement of the award by Singapore's EA restraining the FRL from going ahead with the deal.

In the absence of stay from the top court, the high court had noted that it has no option but to enforce the order passed by its single judge on March 18.

On March, a single judge bench of the high court, besides restraining FRL from going ahead with its deal with Reliance Retail, had imposed costs of Rs 20 lakh on the Future Group and others associated with it. The judge had also ordered attachment of their properties.

The top court on August 6, delivered a judgment favouring Amazon by upholding Singapore EA's award, restraining the Rs 24,731 crore FRL-Reliance Retail merger deal, as valid and enforceable under Indian arbitration laws.

 

Future Retail seeks early hearing by SC on appeal against HC order

Future Retail seeks early hearing by SC on appeal against HC order


The Supreme Court on Friday said it will give a date on Future Retail Ltd's (FRL) fresh appeal challenging the Delhi High Court order, which asked it to implement its earlier direction restraining the firm from going ahead with its Rs 24,731 crore merger with Reliance Retail.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana told counsel representing the FRL: "Let me look into the file and I will give a date."

Senior advocates Harish Salve and Mukul Rohatgi, representing the FRL, sought early hearing on the appeal from the bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant and A.S. Bopanna. The counsel sought early hearing on appeal, as the high court would go ahead with the enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator's (EA's) award, if stay is not granted in its favour by the apex court.

Salve argued that the high court order will have far-reaching consequences and added that the FRL's appeal be heard on September 9, as the high court is scheduled to hear the matter on September 16.

Referring to another appeal, Rohatgi contended high court had ordered attachment of entire property. He further added contempt proceedings would be initiated if the Future group and others do not get a favourable order from the top court.

On August 17, the high court asked FRL to implement the earlier single-judge bench order restraining it from going ahead with the deal. The high court passed the order as e-commerce giant Amazon sought enforcement of the award by Singapore's EA restraining the FRL from going ahead with the deal.

In the absence of stay from the top court, the high court had noted that it has no option but to enforce the order passed by its single judge on March 18.

On March, a single judge bench of the high court, besides restraining FRL from going ahead with its deal with Reliance Retail, had imposed costs of Rs 20 lakh on the Future Group and others associated with it. The judge had also ordered attachment of their properties.

The top court on August 6, delivered a judgment favouring Amazon by upholding Singapore EA's award, restraining the Rs 24,731 crore FRL-Reliance Retail merger deal, as valid and enforceable under Indian arbitration laws.

 

Leave a comment

Comments (0)

Opinion Express TV

Shapoorji Pallonji

GOVNEXT INDIA FOUNDATION

CAMBIUM NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY

Opinion Express Magazine

TRANS GLOBE ADVISORS